Archive for September, 2008

Sep 20 2008

I Don’t Know Why She Swallowed a Fly

Published by topspun under babygirl

Note to Story-Teller Lady at the Lincoln Square Applefest Story Time: The old lady who swallowed a fly? She dies. She swallows a bunch of animals in a cascading attempt to capture a fly, and then swallows an entire horse, and dies. She does not “pop,” only to be re-inflated by a bunch of kids blowing breath into her (the spatial logic of which is itself hard to swallow). She dies. I quote: “There was an old lady who swallowed a horse. She’s dead, of course.” That’s how it goes.

No responses yet

Sep 17 2008

Communist (Like Us)

In which Jim Cramer accuses Chris Cox, the head of Bush’s Securities and Exchange Commission, of being a communist. It’s hard to get laughs like this for free.

No responses yet

Sep 14 2008

Disaster (Capitalism)

The spiralling financial crisis hit another benchmark today, as evidenced by the panic of the Lehman Brothers collapse. There’s a very good story in the New York Times detailing the “fear” on Wall Street today – a Sunday. This morning, she showed me a wedding announcement in the Times; the groom’s father was a managing director at Lehman. We hypothesized that perhaps the impending bankruptcy of the fourth largest investment bank may put a damper on the joyous event. Quelle dommage.

Fear and greed are the stuff that Wall Street is made of. But inside the great banking houses, those high temples of capitalism, fear came to the fore this weekend.

As Lehman Brothers, one of oldest names on Wall Street, appeared to unravel on Sunday, anxiety over the bank’s fate — and over what might happen next — gripped the nation’s financial industry. By late afternoon, Merrill Lynch, under mounting pressure, entered into talks to sell itself to Bank of America.

Dinner parties were canceled. Weekend getaways were postponed. All of Wall Street, it seemed, was on high alert.

In skyscrapers across Manhattan, banking executives were holed up inside their headquarters, within cocoons of soft rugs and wood-paneled walls, desperately trying to assess their company’s exposure to the stricken Lehman. It was, by all accounts, a day unlike anything Wall Street had ever seen.

Sounds like a lot of fun. I remember working on election day, 2000. We were closing a deal for Allegheny Power, some selling off of generation assets and releasing of transmission assets under a bond, I don’t really remember the details. It all seemed vaguely pomo to me, that you would get rid of the energy production business and get into the energy movement business. In any case, we were in the conference room and on the phone with the in-house lawyer for Allegheny, and the lawyer I was working with asked “So, who do you like for the election?” The Allegheny guy said “Well, I guess Bush would be good for us in the medium short-term as far as dereg, but…” And then he stopped. The lawyer on our side (a good friend of mine still) just laughed. Yeah, he said. I know. We shook our heads, and could practically hear the Allegheny guy shaking his. And so here you have it. Bear Stearns, vanished. Lehman poised for bankruptcy. Merrill Lynch peddling itself to any taker whatsoever, desperate to fend off the short sellers. What a monumental mess.

But I think back to election day 2000, the World Trade Center still standing less than a quarter mile behind me, doomed the moment later that night when NBC took Florida out of the Gore column, and our view of New York harbor from the conference room, and the lawyer for Allegheny Energy who knew, but couldn’t say, that a Bush-Cheney administration was a deeply, deeply stupid idea. I often say that the American people – whatever that is – got it right that day. Yes, we often forget, but they did get it right, by 500,000 votes. Bush received fewer votes than Gore by a long shot; there’s something striking and fundamentally appropriate about that, something that usually goes unsaid. It kind of hangs in the air with each disaster that has afflicted us since then. People rejected the cruelty and instability of the Bush-Cheney program that day. It’s often forgotten, and bears repeating. But now I also think of all the neo-cons, free marketers, and Friedmanites at Bear and at Lehman who no doubt thought the same: good for us in the medium short-term. Well, the medium short-term is over, and I hope they relished it.

It’s true that schadenfreude is an unattractive posture, especially when the financial services industry is a route to the middle class for many of the people I grew up with, for so many in the Outer Boroughs and the poor neighborhoods of New York, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles. Yes. And as we well know here at Seven Red. It ain’t all fat cats and neo-cons. Like all groups, it is made up mostly of the decent. So schadenfreude is usually unattractive, sure. But only usually. Sometimes, it’s all that’s left.

On edit: The “guy” who was getting married this weekend was not just any guy, but Theodore Roosevelt V (that is, the fifth). His dad, Theodore Roosevelt IV, is the managing director at Lehman.

No responses yet

Sep 14 2008

Microcosm

Published by topspun under Uncategorized

The Mets’ loss today was like a miniature version of the 2007 season. Just terrible. Hopefully, the sting of it will help them buck up for this road trip, while the Phils nip at their heels, as per usual. Very disheartening.

No responses yet

Sep 13 2008

Treading Water

Published by topspun under Uncategorized

So so day for the Metropolitans. They dropped one they really should have won after a tough performance from Johann. It’s just another signal that the bats will have to stay lively to support the relief crew, but I think we already knew that. The second game went much better, with solid contributions from the likely suspects. I like that beltran seems to feel better this September. The bullpen also stepped up in Game 2. Barring a bad eighth inning in the first game, the Mets essentially shut out the Braves for 17 innings, which is not bad.

The contuing slide of the Brewers is a mixed bag. It’s good because the Cubbies are more or less assured their playoff spot this year, and this town is going to be fun and crazy with the Cubs in the hunt. It’s bad because the Brew Crew should be beating up on the Phillies and giving us more breathing room. Then again, the breathing room is coming from the other direction, since the collapse of the Brewers mean that the NL East is increasingly looking like it will field the Wild Card team, whether that ends up being the Phils or the Mets. Still, I’d like to see Milwaukee take at least one from Philadelphia, if only to slow their roll a bit.

No responses yet

Sep 11 2008

Funny Things I Heard Today

Published by topspun under Politics

Regarding Palin’s belligerent know-nothing War Posture:

“She put the hawk in hawkey mom.”

“Oh no. It’s Apocalipstick Now.”

No responses yet

Sep 10 2008

Quietly

Published by topspun under sports

Given the fact that my posts on this very blog – specifically those predicting that the Mets would now easily win the NL East – were directly responsible for a massive jinx and late-season collapse, I’ve been cautious about any postings this season. I noted the Mets’ season changing winning streak right before the All Star Break, but I’ve otherwise suffered in silence, watching Manuel put together a passibly good team, and watching Delgado make a bid for MVP. So tonight I’ll right, with the Mets enjoying their largest lead of the season thus far, though that lead is only 3.5 games over the Phillies, who overcame a 7 game deficit last year.

I won’t predict that the Mets will win the East, but I will say that they’ve quietly assembled an interesting set of weapons, and an offensive line-up that any team in the NL would do well to fear. Their absolute thrashing of the Brewers last week was a wake-up call for the NL: if the Mets hold on to the East and claim a spot, you shouldn’t expect them to go out easily. These last few weeks have also seen the Cubs stagnant (they were damn lucky, in fact, that the Mets walked into Milwaukee when they did), and the Brewers limping along, so the Mets, a sub-500 team until just before the break, are within shooting distance of the NL leaderboard’s top spot. The Phillies will have their own chance against the Brewers this week – and at home. It’s a crucial series for them. They’ve lost three straight since pulling within a half game of the Mets, so any continued backsliding might be demoralizing as October looms. The Mets, for their part, will have to stay focused and try to pull a few games while the Phils struggle with Milwaukee. I said earlier this year that the wild card team would certainly come out of the NL Central, since St. Louis, Milwaukee, and the Cubbies were all leaps and bounds ahead of the East and West teams at the time. Now I’m not so sure. If the Phils sweep the Brew Crew, and the Mets put together some wins as well, that would place both Philly and NY in shooting distance or past the Brews record. What we’ve actually seen these last three weeks, in addition to strong play in the NL East, is the collapsing fortunes of the NL Central. With all the hype and amazing play by the Cubs, any further erosion of the now expected World Series bid will seriously bum this town out. I’ll be wearing the Orange and Blue though, so I won’t be too sad about it…

No responses yet

Sep 10 2008

Lies, Phony Outrage, and Swiftboat Politics

Published by topspun under Politics

Yeah, that’s about right…

No responses yet

Sep 10 2008

And So You’re Back…

Published by topspun under Politics

Love it…

Only George Bush could make the most neoliberal government in a generation nationalize large portions of the financial sector.

One response so far

Sep 09 2008

The Dentist and the Fraud

Published by topspun under Politics,pointless rants

When Seven Red lived in San Francisco, I worked as a fraud investigator for P——- Bank, a credit card company.  It wasn’t as CSI as it sounds. I basically went to work everyday, where I found a list of about 300 flagged accounts. The accounts had been flagged for a variety of reasons, but it was mostly third party checks and strange large payments on maxed out new accounts. My job was primarily to prevent check kiting, so I would go through the list, calling banks and sometimes the customer or check writer to make sure that the checks were authorized and drew on sufficient funds. About 80% of the checks were fine, somebody’s mother-in-law paying off a large balance, and that sort of thing. It was the other 20% – the fraud cases – that made the job fun.

Of the 20% fraud cases, most were professional check kiters. They committed credit card fraud for a living. These people were ghosts. They would apply for an account under a fake name, run up the balance to the maximum, pay that off with a bad check (usually a stolen “convenience” check either grabbed out of a mailbag or bought on the black market), run up the balance again, and rinse and repeat until the account was shut down. They used post office boxes or Mailboxes Etc, and tried to mask those as apartment buildings. They had cloned cell phones that could not be connected to them personally. They essentially didn’t exist except as accounts. My job wasn’t to “catch” anybody. Rather, I was just there to stop the bleeding on these fraud accounts.I actually enjoyed dealing with the professional kiters, because there was never any bullshit. Sure, they’d try to talk you into accepting the bad check so they could kite the account one more time, but usually they just accepted that that account was dead. Since most of these people had multiple fraud accounts circulating in various banks, they weren’t too concerned when one dried up. It was a volume operation. I even had one guy tell me straight out, “OK, I guess you closed this one. I’ll hit you guys up for another couple thousand next month.” I replied, “Alright, man. Talk to you then.” I admired these guys. They were professionals, and, in a way, so was I. It was a game, and I enjoyed playing it. Needless to say, I didn’t give a good goddamn about P——- Bank or its fraud losses, but the puzzle solving and “competitiveness” aspect of the job meant that I ended up doing well, and stopping a lot of fraud accounts.

One of my favorite stories. When I was a teenager, I had various reasons for wanting to be out all night, as my readers are well aware. I was not, however, allowed to stay out all night. That was a problem. So, we all used to game our parents by telling them that we would be staying at so-and-so’s house that night. Like most parents, my folks insisted that I leave a phone number if I was staying at so-and-so’s house for the night. That’s where the fun starts. In the 718 area code (for Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx), there exists some glitch in the phone system. If you dial any real exchange (the first three numbers), and follow that up with the numbers 9970, you get a busy signal. It still works. I just tried. So, for example, 718-539-9970 uses a real exchange (539), and it gets a busy signal. Ditto 359, another real exchange. Go ahead and try it. It will be busy every time. You can, of course, see where this is going. We all used to provide our parents with a phone number of this sort. If they tried to call to verify or location, oops, busy. This was a very useful information tool when you wanted to be out in the city at all hours of the night and up to no fucking good.

So, here I am in San Francisco checking out yet another fraud account, and I look at the address (I always looked at the address first, since Miami, Brooklyn, and Detroit addresses were high prevalence for fraud at the time, and I knew all the Mailboxes Etc locations in those areas). Hey, wattaya know! This guy is listed as living just two blocks from where I grew up in Queens. Huh, here I am all the way across the country, etc. Then I see the phone number listed for the account: 718-461-9970. 9970, I think. No fucking way. That’s a fraud account. Imagine the bad luck of this fraudster to run into me as a fraud checker in San Francisco! I even got to talk to this stooge on his cell phone (cloned), and advised him that I was wise to the trick. He was impressed, but the guy was a pro: talk to you again next month. Maybe, but not with this trick, pal. His account got blocked, and I advised my manager about the old 9970 trick. When they ran a check, they found 32 live accounts using the same dirty home phone. I didn’t get a bonus, but, as you can see, it was kinda a fun job that way.

So now to the small minority of the amateur fraudsters, maybe 5-7% of total. These people I despised. They were uniformly stupid, and always left some trail that led directly back to them, personally. Their stories were often tawdry, kids stealing from their parents or grandparents. People ripping off their employers. One woman worked in the mailroom of a hospital, and tried to kite her account with a check she took right out of the mail in her own station. She  literally crossed out the hospital’s name on the PAY TO line, wrote in P——– Bank, and sent it to us. Third party check, instantly flagged and just as instantly confirmed as fraud when I contacted the account holder and the original payee. This woman used her own real name on her account, so the hospital identified her immediately. It was pathetic, and she went to jail, and I don’t like sending people to jail. I truly hated these fuckers, because they were really bad and really transparent. When you got them on the phone – and you always did – they would spew the worst lies and continue with them even in the face of contrary evidence, which I always took as a personal insult to my intelligence. They’d delay you and dodge you, meaning that their obvious fraud accounts would stay on my daily list of 300 flagged accounts until I could make a solid determination, increasing my work for the day. They made me so mad that I would make it my mission each day to be as rude to them as possible – a posture that was certainly encouraged by management. If you’re going to be a criminal, at least be good at what you do.

Why this long post on my old fraud days? That’s the read I get off this Sarah Palin knucklehead. She’s like a bad fraudster, distasteful and the worst sort of liar. She’s caught out there again and again with her ridiculous lies, and yet keeps on with them, insisting against all reason that the lie holds. It actually makes you respect the form of fraud committed by Bush and Cheney, who are at least good at their lies, like our professional fraudsters at P——- Bank. But this Palin? It’s strictly amateur hour with Palin. Atrios noted earlier this week that repeating the lies in the most obvious way is not a bug but a feature of the Palin candidacy. It’s meant to piss you off, and energizes the GOP base whenever liberals or lefties yelp in outrage over the boldness of her lies. That’s probably right. But still. Could such a cheap seat fraud succeed?

One case I’ll never forget. A secretary was robbing an old dentist in Alabama. She had established two credit card accounts, one at P—— Bank and one at MBNA, and she was just charging the shit out of them, paying each off with the other (MBNA was notorious for accepting all convenience check charges, regardless of obvious illegitimacy). Moreover, it turns out she was in cahoots with the dentist’s wife. That meant that we couldn’t reach the dentist himself either at home or at the office, since the secretary and the wife would block our access to him, knowing full well that he had no clue these accounts even existed in his name. Pure amateur hour fraud. She even had it set up so that the alternate number, supposedly to an accountant, led to another line on her desk. She would literally pretend to be the accountant on that line, though it was obviously her. I remember that she used to say “You betcha!” a lot. You betcha this. You betcha that. It made me furious. Funny story. I had another investigator across from me call the accountant’s line while I was on the phone with the secretary. She was sitting there putting us each on hold to talk to the other. So, she would talk to me as the secretary, then put me on hold, and talk to my colleague as the accountant. Back and forth, back and forth. Then we sprung the trap. I exchanged phones with my colleague in the middle of a hold. She thought she had confused the lines, so the “accountant” started talking to me as the secretary, and my colleague as the “accountant.” What a fucking joke she was. But the “dentist” kept paying the minimum on the MBNA account, and they kept paying us, and we had no confirmation, so we couldn’t close his account.

Finally, after two weeks of this (most cases were closed in two days or less), I managed to get the dentist on the line. He refused to believe that his sweet secretary would try to rob him. I faxed him evidence, I explained the whole fraud in detail, I went over it with him again and again. We got the fraud department at MBNA on the line and they confirmed it as well. He was ten grand in the hole to both banks behind this fraud. He refused to believe it. I faxed this guy checks in his name to an account he didn’t know existed, and he refused to believe it. My manager, equally enraged by this fraud, told him that he either pay the balance in full or press charges against the secretary. He opted to pay the balance. I went out and got drunk. We closed the account down that day.

Could such a cheap fraud succeed? Yes. You betcha.

One response so far

Next »

Creative Commons License

RUNNING on Wordpress